And a post that the judiciary considers more dangerous to its About the competition authority than corruption and miscarriage of justice
I was a participant in the competition to select a member of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine (instead of the head of this body who resigned due to a high-profile scandal ).
28 judges applied for the competition, and four were admitted toAbout the competition interviews.
I made it to the semifinals. No further.
Now the High Council of Justice will choose between Oksana Andriychuk (Economic Court of Rivne Region) and Vitaliy Kryklyv (High Anti-Corruption Court).
How I woke up the “dead”
She shared her impressions of the competition with her Facebook c level executive list readers. She invited those who wish to follow the links and form a personal opinion about the course of the interviews with the favorites: Andriychuk , Kryklyvyi . And the outsiders: Golnyk , Yanyuk .
I expressed doubts about the objectivity of the preliminary procedures applied by the Competition Commission. In the validity of the selection of finalists. I personally did not notice the indisputability of their advantages – neither by the criterion of integrity nor professional competence.
In leading media outlets and posts by reputable NGOs, the DEJURE Foundation , and Automaidan , there were weighty accusations against the virtues of one of the winners of the round. They are difficult to refute – with the best way to understand due diligence. But the commission members did not ask the candidate all the questions necessary to find out the truth.
I supported my perception of the candidate’s level
Of competence with the reaction of the Telegram channel Union of Dead Lawyers .
The “union” did not hesitate to respond with a cartoonish response . Like a series of jokes about a blonde .
Only instead of it, the opus features a kind of misunderstanding that comes up aqb directory at every question: I am a whistleblower, I have my own criteria of integrity, I have the right to call judges sheep.